On 31 Jul 2026, at 13:08, denis walker <[email protected]> wrote:

[…]

> The rules of the game are set by policy. Policy is set by the RIPE community. 
> It only takes a handful of people saying yes and the rules are changed. Then 
> ALL resource holders, LIRs, End Users MUST obey the new rules. If you 
> persistently break the rules you can be closed down and have resources taken 
> away. To me, that sounds like a definition of absolute authority. 
> 
> But let's get to the core of your issue here. Do you have a problem with 
> limiting malicious abusive behaviour on the Internet? Or are you just arguing 
> over any point to slow the process down and ultimately prevent any policy 
> from addressing this problem? 
> 
> EVERY time we have looked at this issue over the last couple of decades, 
> 'someone' creates background noise, finds problems, develops arguments 
> against and ultimately prevents any action from being taken. A couple of 
> people even said it in this thread. This WG has a reputation for not taking 
> action. This has to change. That's why I'm suggesting a very simple policy. 
> Here's a list of bad things. You must not do these. Do you have a problem 
> with this? 

Who would investigate claims? Who would judge?

The RIPE NCC has a good structure for handing things out when conditions are 
met. But taking them away is much more challenging and expensive.

Even if a policy proposal along these lines was accepted, implementation would 
probably require higher fees, which might be a challenge.

Regards,

Leo
-----
To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, 
please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/security-wg.ripe.net/
As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the 
email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. 
More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/

Reply via email to