> On 2 Aug 2026, at 16:51, denis walker <[email protected]> wrote: > [..] > As things stand there is no accountability, no penalty. It's either full > closure or untouchable. We need a rethink and a reset. This is what I am > working on.... Reverse DNS is needed to spam properly. IRR / RPKI / ASPA is needed to route (though RPKI/ASPA becomes 'unknown' which is the majority of prefixes today) So yes, if a RIR does not delegate then a prefix becomes a lot less useable. Thus marking a LIR as 'under investigation' or similar and then at non-response closing it can be a means to stop the abuse. But, it becomes really tricky if an LIR is saying one thing and a pile of others are saying another (they did abuse etc) And I do not think RIRs have the resources (unless membership fees go insane) to resolve that. Even if a RIR gives out an 'advise' that the resources are 'tainted' or 'likely abuse' a legal proceeding can cause a whole lot of problems for the RIR. Same for blacklists of course, as the folks from the original MAPS and nowadays Spamhaus and similar setups can attest to, the legal issues are the biggest problem there. (and for some on the wrong side, people claim that the *good* people from Spamhaus do not respond to the delisting requests etc... ) Regards, Jeroen ----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/security-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
[Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are increasingly no longer monitored and are being replaced by (bad) forms
Jeroen Massar via Security-wg Sun, 02 Aug 2026 13:28:27 -0700
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Randy Bush
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Serge Droz via Security-wg
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Gert Doering
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Sergey Myasoedov via Security-wg
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Gert Doering
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Serge Droz via Security-wg
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Hank Nussbacher
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... jordi.palet--- via Security-wg
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... denis walker
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Jeroen Massar via Security-wg
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... denis walker
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Sergey Myasoedov via Security-wg
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Gert Doering
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Sergey Myasoedov via Security-wg
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Leo Vegoda
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... jordi.palet--- via Security-wg
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Leo Vegoda
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... jordi.palet--- via Security-wg
- [Security-wg] Re: Abuse mailboxes are inc... Michael Richardson
