Hi, On Sun, Aug 02, 2026 at 11:31:27PM +0300, Sergey Myasoedov via Security-wg wrote: > >> Technically, we crossed this line when we introduced not just the company > >> names, but also their registration numbers into the RIPE Database. NWI-21. > > > > This very much sounds like a thing a registry would do, like, register > > numbers and document who has them, in an unambiguous way? So which line > > exactly was crossed by publishing more unambiguous holder info, for > > legal entities? > > Not all of the data collected by the registry should be published. Publishing > an "official" identifier is a significant step to future steps towards > technical and/or political restrictions based on the registry data.
The RIPE NCC does not publish "all the data collected", far from it.
It does, and should, publish who is the receiver of a set of numbers
received from the RIPE NCC. In commercial relationships, requiring the
legal registry number of your contract partner is the most normal thing
to do (at least over here).
I fail to make the conclusion how this will pave the way to future
"restrictions based on the data".
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard,
Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: Dr. Frank ThiƤner
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/security-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
