On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 10:55:55AM +0200, Dominick Grift wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 03:42:50PM -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote:
> > Dominick Grift wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 11:22:00AM -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote:the
> > > > Dominick Grift wrote:
> > > > <snip>
> > > >
> > > > > The idea is nice, unfortunately its inflexible and it has
> > > > > hard-references to reference policy all-over. It has potential but it
> > > > > is still rough.
> > > > >
> > > > Of course, it is an analysis of a refpolicy-based policy. If you want to
> > > > analyze a different policy (e.g., Android or home-rolled) you will have
> > > > to
> > > > change out all of the type sets, etc.
> > > >
> > > > You can't make a magic generic analysis script without knowing how key
> > > > parts
> > > > of the system work and what types are associated with those components.
> > >
> > > What do you mean? that for example that hard-coded array of "trusted"
> > > types. Is that not just redundant.
> > >
> >
> > you mean the example trusted types? I'm not sure I understand your concern.
> >
> > > Can't i just create that array myself and use it to exlude rules with
> > > types in that array? That was one does not have to hard-code it.
> > >
> >
> > It is python, you can do anything you want. The example notebook is a
> > starting point, anyone doing an analysis would probably make major changes
> > for their analysis, which is the point. You modify the notebook to build a
> > usable analysis between the starting policy and the policy you are
> > analyzing.
> >
> > I've thought about trying this on an Android policy but haven't made it a
> > priority.
> >
> > > Also with regard to hardcoding the refpolicy file system
> > > (ps.load_policy_source). I mean if youre just going to `grep -r` then why
> > > do we have to assume anything there and hard code file suffixed,
> > > directory structures etc etc?
> >
> >
>
> ahh.. sorry. I just noticed that it can be overriden:
>
> p, ps, bp, bps = se.load_policies_from_config("policy_paths.config")
>
> so i suppose i should be able to add that file to the notebook dir and
> specify my own paths.
>
> although that still doesnt deal with any file suffixes? (.cil)take for example: https://github.com/QuarkSecurity/SPAN/blob/master/span/span.py#L331 "domain" is a reference policy type attribute One should expand on the "policy_paths.config" concept and allow us, via configuration files, to override all the variables (attributes, suffixes, paths, identifiers, etc) So that the variables can we adjusted without the need to reinstall/recompile a modified SPAN Or just rename to RPAN (reference policy analysis notebook) > > -- > Key fingerprint = 5F4D 3CDB D3F8 3652 FBD8 02D5 3B6C 5F1D 2C7B 6B02 > https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3B6C5F1D2C7B6B02 > Dominick Grift -- Key fingerprint = 5F4D 3CDB D3F8 3652 FBD8 02D5 3B6C 5F1D 2C7B 6B02 https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3B6C5F1D2C7B6B02 Dominick Grift
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
