On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:11:14 PM UTC-7, Elad Ossadon wrote: > > Feature request: > > Have exists? method for dataset: > > Article.where(slug: "hello").exists? >
This would basically just be the opposite of empty? !Article.where(slug: 'hello').empty? One of the reasons I don't like the name exists? is that exists? implies a single record, but it is called on the dataset. Even if the dataset is empty, it still exists. I'm not sure an additional method is needed, since the desired behavior is just !empty?, but I'm certainly willing to consider other people's opinions, and possible alternative method names if they are in favor of adding such a method. Thanks, Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
