Could also override Enumberable's any? in case a block wasn't sent. On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:27:43 PM UTC-7, Elad Ossadon wrote: > > However, it's a common ActiveSupport method. > > On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:23:32 PM UTC-7, Elad Ossadon wrote: >> >> Thanks! How about present? >> >> On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:21:54 PM UTC-7, Jeremy Evans wrote: >>> >>> On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:11:14 PM UTC-7, Elad Ossadon wrote: >>>> >>>> Feature request: >>>> >>>> Have exists? method for dataset: >>>> >>>> Article.where(slug: "hello").exists? >>>> >>> >>> This would basically just be the opposite of empty? >>> >>> !Article.where(slug: 'hello').empty? >>> >>> One of the reasons I don't like the name exists? is that exists? implies >>> a single record, but it is called on the dataset. Even if the dataset is >>> empty, it still exists. >>> >>> I'm not sure an additional method is needed, since the desired behavior >>> is just !empty?, but I'm certainly willing to consider other people's >>> opinions, and possible alternative method names if they are in favor of >>> adding such a method. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jeremy >>> >>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
