On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:29:35 PM UTC-7, Elad Ossadon wrote: > > Could also override Enumberable's any? in case a block wasn't sent. >
#present? I'm against for the same reason I'm against exists?, it implies a single object but it is called on a set. Personally, I think it's a stupid name even for a single object. I believe the method name was derived from validates_presence_of in ActiveRecord, and while validates_presence_of :column makes a bit of sense, "a".present? or 1.present? do not. #any? if read as "are there any elements in the dataset?", while not a perfect name, makes sense to me, and should be backwards compatible, as an optimization to the current behavior. Thanks, Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
