However, it's a common ActiveSupport method. On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:23:32 PM UTC-7, Elad Ossadon wrote: > > Thanks! How about present? > > On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:21:54 PM UTC-7, Jeremy Evans wrote: >> >> On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:11:14 PM UTC-7, Elad Ossadon wrote: >>> >>> Feature request: >>> >>> Have exists? method for dataset: >>> >>> Article.where(slug: "hello").exists? >>> >> >> This would basically just be the opposite of empty? >> >> !Article.where(slug: 'hello').empty? >> >> One of the reasons I don't like the name exists? is that exists? implies >> a single record, but it is called on the dataset. Even if the dataset is >> empty, it still exists. >> >> I'm not sure an additional method is needed, since the desired behavior >> is just !empty?, but I'm certainly willing to consider other people's >> opinions, and possible alternative method names if they are in favor of >> adding such a method. >> >> Thanks, >> Jeremy >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
