Thanks! How about present? On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:21:54 PM UTC-7, Jeremy Evans wrote: > > On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:11:14 PM UTC-7, Elad Ossadon wrote: >> >> Feature request: >> >> Have exists? method for dataset: >> >> Article.where(slug: "hello").exists? >> > > This would basically just be the opposite of empty? > > !Article.where(slug: 'hello').empty? > > One of the reasons I don't like the name exists? is that exists? implies a > single record, but it is called on the dataset. Even if the dataset is > empty, it still exists. > > I'm not sure an additional method is needed, since the desired behavior is > just !empty?, but I'm certainly willing to consider other people's > opinions, and possible alternative method names if they are in favor of > adding such a method. > > Thanks, > Jeremy >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
