Oliver:
Thank you for the pointers. It really helps.
I did not realize I would need access to the JMX
port on the remote controller.
Regarding the backupers, it looks like they use
the JMX port on the remote controllers so I need
remote access to a total of 3 ports.
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (214)986-3533, www.JAMMConsulting.com
FREE! Eliminate junk email and reclaim your inbox.
Visit http://www.spammilter.com for details.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Olivier Fambon
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 7:09 AM
> To: Sequoia general mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Sequoia] Network layout for two geographically
> separate machines
>
> Neil Aggarwal wrote [10/25/2006 12:22 AM]:
> ...
> > Please take a look at the attached diagram.
> >
>
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> one minor comment: from your diagram, it seems that you miss
> one set of
> 'well hidden' ports. The backupers use a separate TCP connection to
> transfer dumps (see BackupManager.setupDumpFileServer()). As
> long as you
> don't use the transfer dump command, this is not an issue for
> you though.
>
> Also, you left - may be on purpose - the management part of
> the system
> out of the picture (JMX ports).
>
> With the 4 sets of ports (jdbc, jmx, group-comm, backupers),
> you should
> have a complete picture.
>
> My 2 cts.
>
> A+O.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sequoia mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
_______________________________________________
Sequoia mailing list
[email protected]
https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
