Olivier:
Thanks for the follow up and the detailed answers.
It really helps.
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (214)986-3533, www.JAMMConsulting.com
FREE! Eliminate junk email and reclaim your inbox.
Visit http://www.spammilter.com for details.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Olivier Fambon
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 5:04 AM
> To: Sequoia general mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Sequoia] Network layout for two geographically
> separate machines
>
> Neil Aggarwal wrote [10/25/2006 08:20 PM]:
>
> > Is there a way to force the transfer port to have
> > a fixed IP address or fixed range of IP addresses?
>
> No, not as it is now. Only the ip address can be specified with the
> dumpServer option of the <Backuper/> element. You may wish to
> hack the
> code to allow for port specification.
>
> > I assume the data transfer does not use an encrypted
> > connection (Let me know if this is wrong) so I would
> > like to have them tunneled through SSL for security
> > of the data.
>
> You are right, the data transfer uses plain sockets.
>
> > Does the CLC actually need to be able to access the
> > JMX port of the remote controller? It looks like I
> > do not since the communication will go over the group
> > protocol.
>
> You are right, the CLC does not need to be able to access the
> JMX port
> of the remote controller for the transfer to happen.
>
>
> A+O.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sequoia mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
_______________________________________________
Sequoia mailing list
[email protected]
https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
