On Thursday 04 December 2008, Johansson Olle E wrote: > > thanks for the comments. I agree that its a complicated module, and > > one functions is in there (cr_prime_route) to mainly support the special > > needs of our infrastructure. There exists some functionality that could be > > moved to a new module, for example the config file functionality. But on > > the other hand our admins like to have only one interface for all > > machines. Another option would be to move this failure_route > > functionality, but this is only one function, so there is not much to > > gain here. > > I feel that software has to be easy to understand. If I'm looking for > failover, I won't look deep into a module called "carrierroute"... So even > if it's only one small function, it irritates my feeling of logic... ;-)
Hi Olle, i agree. :-) Let me think about this, now with the seperated tree library it should be easier to move this to a new module.. But as this is not really related to the prefix_module from Alfred, lets stop here. Henning _______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
