Daniel,

Is it not possible to resolve the servernames in the VirtualUserTable with a
matcher and/or a mailet?

Regards,

Pierre

On 2/3/06, Daniel Perry (JIRA) <server-dev@james.apache.org> wrote:
>
>     [
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-426?page=comments#action_12365067]
>
> Daniel Perry commented on JAMES-426:
> ------------------------------------
>
> I agree.  The code i provided shouldn't affect any user of james, unless
> they add the extra attribute, so therefore could be added without causing
> any problems.  I would suggest that it is put to a vote on the dev list, but
> as i am not a commiter, I dont really have a say.
>
> Daniel.
>
> > Make james use virtual user table domains for servernames
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >          Key: JAMES-426
> >          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-426
> >      Project: James
> >         Type: Improvement
> >   Components: James Core
> >  Environment: N/A
> >     Reporter: Daniel Perry
> >     Priority: Trivial
> >  Attachments: patch.txt
> >
> > Attached is a patch that makes james use the virtualusertable database
> for identifying local hosts.  It also allows for continued use of
> servernames block.  It is backwards compatible, and unless an extra
> attribute is added in the configuration, it wont affect james's behaviour.
> > It is configured by adding the domainTable attribute to the servernames
> element, eg:
> > <servernames autodetect="true" autodetectIP="true"
> domainTable="db://maildb/VirtualUserTable">
> > Please note that the patch i will attach against svn trunk, but has been
> copied over directly from 2.2.0, and i havnt had a chance to check if it
> compiles or works with svn trunk.
> > Daniel.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
>    http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
> -
> For more information on JIRA, see:
>    http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>

Reply via email to