On 4/27/07, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/26/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/26/07, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/26/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
> > > > On 4/26/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> As you are using that codebase since months (years?) I think we should
> > > >> simply start the vote for a 0.3 final and skip any RC or anything else.
> > > >
> > > > for first releases of a codebase it is proven heuristically (by the
> > > > incubator for example) that they on average require more than one vote
> > > > :-)
> > >
> > > I don't think we need more votes.
> > > If there are blocking issues people should review them now and raise the
> > > voice (like you did for the IP clearance).
> >
> > my comment was related to formal issues which are typically checked
> > against a distribution package like NOTICE files, copyright headers
> > and such.
>
> i hope to find some time tomorrow to take a look
>
> > I will try to run ARAT against some build later this evening (GMT+1)
> > and try to do some due dilligence while I'm commuting. never built
> > mime4j, never used arat, so...
>
> RAT's needs a lot more work before it's easy to interpret but give it a go...
it is already running in the debugger; will give you some feedback on
googlecode ;-)
i'm just so short of time ATM :-/
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
