Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: > On 4/26/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> As you are using that codebase since months (years?) I think we should >> simply start the vote for a 0.3 final and skip any RC or anything else. > > for first releases of a codebase it is proven heuristically (by the > incubator for example) that they on average require more than one vote > :-)
I don't think we need more votes. If there are blocking issues people should review them now and raise the voice (like you did for the IP clearance). Once this issues are cleared up we should not find showstoppers and I would try to release the final anyone. RC are needed when there are code issues and I bet no one will test the code between our RC and a final much more that what have been done until today. Btw, my vote is to try for the final as soon as every licensing/legal issue has been cleared. But I don't care too much about the procedure. If you feel better with an RC I'm ok, but then you will have to test the RC, too ;-) > I already downloaded ARAT from http://code.google.com/p/arat/ > > Can somebody give a quick executive summary about IP clearance regarding > mime4j? > > Thanks, > Bernd Well, when I landed to James mime4j was already there. So I just thought that legal issues have been solved more than 2 years ago when the sourcecode has been committed to ASF repository. Can anyone confirm this? Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
