Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: > >> On 4/26/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> As you are using that codebase since months (years?) I think we should >>> simply start the vote for a 0.3 final and skip any RC or anything else. >>> >> for first releases of a codebase it is proven heuristically (by the >> incubator for example) that they on average require more than one vote >> :-) >> > > I don't think we need more votes. > If there are blocking issues people should review them now and raise the > voice (like you did for the IP clearance). > Once this issues are cleared up we should not find showstoppers and I > would try to release the final anyone. RC are needed when there are code > issues and I bet no one will test the code between our RC and a final > much more that what have been done until today. > > Btw, my vote is to try for the final as soon as every licensing/legal > issue has been cleared. But I don't care too much about the procedure. > > If you feel better with an RC I'm ok, but then you will have to test the > RC, too ;-) > > >> I already downloaded ARAT from http://code.google.com/p/arat/ >> >> Can somebody give a quick executive summary about IP clearance regarding >> mime4j? >> >> Thanks, >> Bernd >> > > Well, when I landed to James mime4j was already there. So I just thought > that legal issues have been solved more than 2 years ago when the > sourcecode has been committed to ASF repository. > > Can anyone confirm this? > Yes, we (Trillian AB) signed the ASF Corporate Contributor License Agreement almost 2.5 years ago before we moved the code over to James. AFAIK everything is in order.
-- Niklas Therning www.spamdrain.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
