On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 05:57:08 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > The template parameter rename I was planning on doing in a followup issue, > > however, if you really want, I can make the fix here too. > > Personally I'd be okay with doing it here as one final commit that can be > viewed in isolation. Sure, I can do it. Is everyone OK with MT as the template parameter name? Another obvious choice is MEM_TAG Side note: why are template parameter names all capitals? To help distinguish them from "regular" parameters? Do we still want that naming scheme, or can we switch here to using mem_tag? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20872#issuecomment-2340957192
