On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:15:53 GMT, Gerard Ziemski <gziem...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Is everyone OK with `MT` as the template parameter name? Another obvious > choice is `MEM_TAG` > > Side note: why are template parameter names all capitals? To help distinguish > them from "regular" parameters? Do we still want that naming scheme, or can > we switch here to using `mem_tag`? Type template parameters should follow the style guide rules for type names. I've not noticed many (any?) cases of noncompliance. Non-type template parameters should follow the style guide rules for ordinary local variables, or perhaps local constants. The style guide doesn't currently say which, doesn't discuss possible differences between local and non-local naming, and is also currently loose on constant names. (The GC team recently discussed constant naming, strongly preferring MixedCase, and strongly disliking ALL_CAPS.) I think I've mostly use local variable style. Non-type template parameters are sometimes used in non-trivial expressions, so having a more meaningful name can be helpful. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20872#issuecomment-2342079640
