On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 01:03:55 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> EDIT: Oh dear. I see I have been under a misapprehension about these template > parameters, I tend to always thing such things are type parameters but they > are not. MT would make sense for a type parameter, but mt would be more > sensible for a non-type parameter. The fact the original was F threw me. I mean, it is still effectively a constant so using CamelCase (or an upper-case abbreviation) isn't really that weird for non-type template parameters, IMHO. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20872#issuecomment-2344023396
