On 8/31/07, Chad Z. Hower aka Kudzu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think having dual licensing with BSD/MPL is going to moot the > > Im not suggesting it be dual like Indy. My suggestion was maybe that we ADD > a BSD clause ON TOP of the MPL... that would just enforce MPL but ALSO > require attribution to the project.
Even attribution isn't -that- important to me, i'm fine with it if it's included.. How would the license be called then, SOL? ;) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ SharpOS-Developers mailing list SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
