In a message dated 12/18/2002 12:51:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah. I didn't mention that because I didn't know what feature of the SC
hosel was patented, nor the terms of the argument. But SC won their
coutersuit. So Adams not only didn't get the relief they wanted by taking
Nickent to court, they were convicted of infringing a Nickent patent in the
process.
Cheers!
DaveT
patent #5106088 and 5328171.
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Al Taylor
- RE: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Childers, Tedd A
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Bernie Baymiller
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? sean weijand
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Volcgolf
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? DADUGALLY
- ShopTalk: Definitions of a "cut and gluer"... Rob Campbell
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Fjbold1
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Dave Tutelman
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Fjbold1
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Dave Tutelman
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Fjbold1
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Dave Tutelman
