|
Tedd,
I have another scenario to consider. I used to work at a
driving range, and the range had a custom clubmaker that worked out of the
range storefront. I worked the range counter, and also helped with the
occasional re-grip or minor repair (loft/lie adjustment), at the request of the
clubmaker. I did not ask or receive any payment for helping with the
clubmaking part of the business. Since I was also a hobbyist and
built my own clubs (and some for my friends), I would occasionally get
approached at the range (when I wasn't working) and asked about making clubs for
someone. I would always suggest that they talk to the clubmaker who worked
at the range, but sometimes they were only interested in having me make the
clubs (as I was willing to use a much wider range of components than the range
guy, who used a very narrow list of suppliers, which might not include the club
or clubs the customer liked)). I never actually accepted one of these
offers, as I felt it was not ethical. The tough part was that the
clubmaker at the range and I did not agree on custom-fitting, as he was a strict
flat-line believer, and I am more of a fit-to -the individual swing kind of
guy. However, I think it is clear that it would have been wrong to
accept any jobs from customers at the range. What do you all
think?
OK. I'd say you did right by referring
the customer to the clubmaker. But, if the clubmaker didn't offer what the
customer needed or wanted, I'd just tell the customer right there at the range
to contact you privately for a "second opinion." You wouldn't be selling
or discussing the sale on the clubmaker's premises and you would be doing the
customer a favor. If you feel guilty about that, give the customer names of a
few more clubmakers as well as yours who could give him/her what is really
wanted. Let the customer make the choice. I don't believe any customer should be
forced to accept theories or components they aren't happy with for lack of any
other options. That's more unethical, IMO, than you offering a "second opinion."
That clubmaker should have explained his reasons for his beliefs and why he
advised using his components. And, if the customer was not in agreement,
the clubmaker should have volunteered another clubmaker who could satisfy the
customer's needs.
Sure will be glad when the doc will let me
play again and I don't sit here at the computer all day getting sucked into
these "philosophical" discussions. :-) Two more weeks maybe.
Bernie
Writeto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- ShopTalk: Life ... James T. Voorhies
- Re: ShopTalk: L... Steve \"Cub\" Culbreth
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Fjbold1
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? DADUGALLY
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling... tflan
- RE: ShopTalk: What's fair re;sel... Royce Engler
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;sel... Steve \"Cub\" Culbreth
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling... Steve \"Cub\" Culbreth
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;sel... Al Taylor
- RE: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Childers, Tedd A
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling... Bernie Baymiller
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;sel... sean weijand
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Volcgolf
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? DADUGALLY
- ShopTalk: Definitions of a "cut... Rob Campbell
- Re: ShopTalk: Definitions of a &... Al Taylor
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Fjbold1
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling... Dave Tutelman
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Fjbold1
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling... Dave Tutelman
- Re: ShopTalk: What's fair re;selling? Fjbold1
