I used "long-aec" for a long time with better results than the default.
I understood a long time ago that the calypso was doing excessive noise reduction, causing sound breakup. But since I did this at a time when everybody else was playing with alsa controls, I decided to wait for a stable configuration. Now with the latest SHR-U, I haven't given any attention to this issue, so I don't know if it's worth it, but I think it is preferable to have a little background noise than a choppy sound.

Pietro Abate wrote:
Hi,

two more here (me and one of my collegues) have the same problem... Is there any solution ? Everything else in the last unstable works pretty
well except few minor usability problems and crashes...

is this another alsa-related problem ? which values did you use for the
ti_calypso_dsp_mode ?

thanks :)
p


On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 05:46:55PM +0100, Davide Scaini wrote:
   On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Hans Zimmerman <[1][email protected]>
   wrote:

     All,

     I've had some complaints from people when calling with my buzz-fixed
     GTA02v5, they do not understand me very well. They say I'm quite loud
     but I can barely be understood. I have been looking around to the
     correct knobs to fine-tune.
     One thing I tried was changing ti_calypso_dsp_mode. It seems I can be
     understood very well when assigning the value long-aec, there is a
     little bit of noise reported back to me. As the default value aec-nr
     does not seem to have great results I would like to try one of the other
     nr settings in combination with long-aec. How can I assign one of the
     other nr values in combination with long-aec to ti_calypso_dsp_mode?
     Is it comma separated or ... ?

     Does anyone know?

     Kind regards,

     Hans

     PS: I did not play with /etc/freesmartphone/alsa/default/gsmhandset in
     this case.
     _______________________________________________
     Shr-User mailing list
     [2][email protected]
     [3]http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user

   Great! I was trying to do the same thing and i asked the same question to
   the community.  "Gandalf" told me that you have to use the +
   I had no time to try this 'cause i'm having hard times... but i'm really
   interested in this topic and i want to solve this issue, so i want to
   collaborate with you in finding a solution (but you have to be patient
   :P).
   d

References

   Visible links
   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user

_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user


_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user

Reply via email to