On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Sebastian Spaeth <[email protected]>wrote:
> OK, that's enough feedback for now. :-) I'll refrain from putting something > out that is called stable, if all other SHR developers disagree with > calling it so. > :P > > I'll continue to wait for the mythical stable milestone that is > stable enough to deserve that praise. I have waited for it since > January 2009, but I'd appreciate if someone puts it out before you > cannot get replacement batteries for the FR anymore.... > I hope we'll be able to provide it before we die. > > @Users: If you want a release that doesn't break your phone on updates, > build and install the shr/stable2009 tree from Openembedded's git > server. I know I am going to install it as a fallback on my FR. There > won't be a shr-stable coming from me. > That's reasonable enough in my pov. Shr testing should be stable enough. > > I apologize for not having discussed this on core in advance, I did not > consider a renaming from shr-testing2009 to shr/stable2009 to be > critical. That was definitely a mistake on my side. > No biggie, we all forget the bureaucracy involved in making such big changes (mostly myself) when we are really enthusiastic and want to do things that look correct in our eyes. -- Tom.
_______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
