On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 22:14:40 +0100, Carsten Strotmann wrote:
>>So far there are 17 people subscribed (!!) which want to support the
>>project, I consider this as a *very* good start :-) Looks like there
>>are quite a lot of other developers who would like to have an up to
>>date RAD-Tool for OS/2.
>>
>>[..]
>>
>>
>>
>>Compiler:
>>Another important question is which compiler to take. Alex and
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] think FreePascal might be the best choice because
>>it's open source and we can change whatever we want. I first thought
>>about VP but as it looks like it's not that good supported the past
>>month and the author does not have the time needed. Because we don't
>>have all data types we need in VP we should maybe start with FreePascal
>>and if we have a working version we still can think about other
>>compilers.
>>URL: http://www.freepascal.org
>>
>There are 17 people starting with this project, and I hope there will be
>even more in the future.
>With so much people and propable more ideas about the direction this
>project should go, it should be kept open for
>* more than one specific compiler
>* more that one specific target system
>* more than one specific host system
And in the future we'll have monter with tons of bugs. I think, we must select one
target,
one host and ont compiler, but don't close project to other ideas and implementation.
>I think we should make this project open enough to not close out helping
>hands, without sacrifying speed and release time.
Of couse.
>I would personally prefer
> compiler: virtual pascal
> target: OS/2, Linux, Win32
> host: OS/2
Ok.
Compiler: fpc
Target: OS/2
Host: OS/2
-----------
To unsubscribe yourself from this list, send the following message
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe sibyl
end
