On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 12:42:13 +0200 (EET), Doodle wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:27:57 -0500 (EST), Yuri Prokushev wrote:
>>So, at current time we have lot of delphi support, like loading of form. We can also
>>make import of sources. Parsing of source and replacing TObject to TSibylObjec, not
>>a problem.
>
>I was still thinking a bit about modifying RTL of VP instead of making different
>named wrappers and units.
>By modifying them, we would have better delphi and sibyl compatibility, easier
>to maintain and understand sources.
>
>We could send back the modified code of RTL to the VP developer(s), so they
>would get more complete delphi support for VP (and heck, even a RAD tool!),
>and we wouldn't have to modify the RTL every time a new version of VP arrives.
>
>Of course, all the above is speculation, and only if VP will be choosen as
>the/one of the compilers.
>
>(I still prefer VP. While using it, the OS/2 support level of FPC can be developed
>to reach VP, so an easy switch can be made later, if needed...)
I agree, but without vpascal.com (?) feedback this is only words. We can distibute
OpenSibyl only one way: patches to VP RTL. And we must select one version for all
OpenSibyl developers. And distributive will work only on this version. Do you know
other way?
-----------
To unsubscribe yourself from this list, send the following message
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe sibyl
end
