For the record, I object. the filed IPR claim at the IETF site is
vague and does not provide sufficient details to isolate the claim at
the US patent office.
I visited the US patent office and searched in the "PAIR" system and
it replied:
Sorry, the entered Application Number "12/243767" is not available.
The number may have been incorrectly typed, or assigned to an
application
that is not yet available for public inspection.
-George
On 28/10/2009, at 11:47 AM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
I am opening a two week wg call for comments on the adoption of this
document as a working group item.
This is a new version of the draft that was presented at the last
IETF meeting (http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/75/slides/sidr-8.pdf).
Potential adoption of the pfx-validate draft as a working group
document was mentioned at that time.
The document is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt
Please respond, either accept or not accept, by Tues Nov 3 2009.
As usual, the rules are that silence does not indicate assent, so
please actively reply.
If you support adoption of this draft as a working group item,
please also indicate whether you will be able to work on the draft
(contribute or review).
--Sandy
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Pradosh Mohapatra (pmohapat) wrote:
The authors would like to request that
draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt be adopted as a SIDR WG
document.
Thanks,
- Pradosh
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
