As I review the thread, there were two calls for adoption (one from a co-author), one call for non-adoption, two responders that were uncertain because of the IPR issues, and three calls for identification of differences between the pfx-validate draft and roa-validation.

Then there followed a discusion of the content of the draft, not the adoption of the draft. (I'm sorry to say that I participated in that.) That discussion effectively hijacked the thread.

I can't call that wg consensus for adoption. Neither can I call it rejection of the idea of adoption.

It is clear to me that there is considerable interest in this topic in the wg. The wg would like to understand the validation approach(es) more completely. I believe that the validation approach is extremely important to BGP security and clear specification of the validation approach is needed for interoperability.

Would the authors prefer to describe, compare, and contrast their validation algorithms for the working group? Would they prefer that some volunteer do that?

--Sandy



On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Sandra Murphy wrote:


I am opening a two week wg call for comments on the adoption of this document as a working group item.

This is a new version of the draft that was presented at the last IETF meeting (http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/75/slides/sidr-8.pdf). Potential adoption of the pfx-validate draft as a working group document was mentioned at that time.

The document is available at:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt

Please respond, either accept or not accept, by Tues Nov 3 2009.

As usual, the rules are that silence does not indicate assent, so please actively reply.

If you support adoption of this draft as a working group item, please also indicate whether you will be able to work on the draft (contribute or review).

--Sandy


On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Pradosh Mohapatra (pmohapat) wrote:

The authors would like to request that
draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt be adopted as a SIDR WG
document.

Thanks,
- Pradosh
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr


_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to