I feel unable to say either way at present. The IPR disclosure at https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1028/ highlights the US Patent Application Serial No. 12/243,767.
In searching for this, at the USPTO I cannot find any relevant documents with that serial. I did try searching for "Cisco" as the named party - but it returned far more applications than I am willing to read through... A direct link to the Patent Application would be appreciated! Cheers Terry On 28/10/09 11:47 AM, "Sandra Murphy" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am opening a two week wg call for comments on the adoption of this > document as a working group item. > > This is a new version of the draft that was presented at the last IETF > meeting (http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/75/slides/sidr-8.pdf). Potential > adoption of the pfx-validate draft as a working group document was > mentioned at that time. > > The document is available at: > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt > > Please respond, either accept or not accept, by Tues Nov 3 2009. > > As usual, the rules are that silence does not indicate assent, so please > actively reply. > > If you support adoption of this draft as a working group item, please also > indicate whether you will be able to work on the draft (contribute > or review). > > --Sandy > > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Pradosh Mohapatra (pmohapat) wrote: > >> The authors would like to request that >> draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt be adopted as a SIDR WG >> document. >> >> Thanks, >> - Pradosh >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >> > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
