Terry Manderson wrote: > I feel unable to say either way at present. > ... > > A direct link to the Patent Application would be appreciated!
Ditto. I'm reluctant to take any stance on this draft without more information on what the patent claims. Additionally, I'd like to see a clear statement as to what this draft says for which the existing draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation is insufficient. Rob -- Robert Loomans email: [email protected] Senior Software Engineer, APNIC sip: [email protected] http://www.apnic.net/ phone: +61 7 3858 3100 _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
