On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
If this document were being last called, then the question would be significantly more complicated. But we are only at WG adoption, as a starting point for work on a topic.
HOWEVER: we have a technically similar draft that has been proposed for WGLC, and we have not heard a definitive statement about whether the IPR claims on draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03 would also apply to draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-03.txt. (I asked on this list last week.) Which doesn't complicate the adoption of this draft, but it might well complicate the WGLC on the current WG document.
-- Sam _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
