Hi Chris, When did the WG reach consensus on adopting this draft?
Thanks, Byron On 13/10/2012, at 12:53 AM, Christopher Morrow <[email protected]> wrote: > Helo, > Since we've been through this for a while (originally) and this has > been quiet for ~1 month... let's call this done and move to the next > step. > > 1) there was lots of discussion on the topic at hand > 2) lots of that discussion was not about acceptance/rejection of the > idea into the WG > 3) lots of people contributed > > I do think we should continue to have this discussion more officially > around a draft, the wg discussion leads me to believe this is the > right course... can the authors spin a newly named version and we can > start discussing the topic / changes? > > I think if, in the end, the wg decides to abandon the work that's also > fine, but we should have a more structured chat about the topic, that > happens around a draft. > > -chris > co-chair > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Murphy, Sandra > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Speaking as wg co-chair >> >> Of course revision and new request for acceptance is possible. >> >> Even arguing some more leading to acceptance of draft as is is a possibility. >> >> Some commentors specifically requested that the discussion be added to some >> existing draft. >> >> Trying to judge wg desire of a way to proceed. >> >> >> --Sandy >> >> >> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Andy Newton >> [[email protected]] >> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:56 PM >> >> To: Murphy, Sandra; Alexey Melnikov; [email protected] >> >> Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are the chairs not allowing the draft authors to address the issues and try >> again? >> >> >> >> -andy >> >> >> >> >> >> From: <Murphy>, Sandra <[email protected]> >> >> Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:10 PM >> >> To: Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >> <[email protected]> >> >> Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <!-- >> p >> {margin-top:0; >> margin-bottom:0} >> --> >> BODY {direction: ltr;font-family: Arial;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;}P >> {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} >> >> Speaking as wg co-chair: >> >> >> >> Certainly a very lively acceptance call! >> >> >> >> The chairs do not see that there was consensus that the wg should adopt this >> draft. >> >> >> >> But there was ample evidence that the wg was interested in the issue - by >> the wg spending lots of time discussing the issue. >> >> >> >> So that leaves the chairs with an ambivalent message. The wg is very >> interested in the topic but not in adopting a draft that would record any >> decisions about the topic. >> >> >> >> What would the wg like to do now? Particularly those who disagreed with the >> content of the draft - if you would dislike the recommendations, are you OK >> with no recommendations instead? >> >> >> >> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair >> >> >> >> >> >> From: >> >> [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Alexey Melnikov >> [[email protected]] >> >> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:12 PM >> >> To: >> [email protected] >> >> Subject: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> On behalf of SIDR WG chairs I would like to initiate 2 weeks acceptance call >> for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting starting from today, August 4th. Please >> send your positive or negative feedback to the mailing list or directly to >> chairs. >> >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> Alexey >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
