<personal opinion>

IMO the idea is worth considering, but only iif some implementable
mechanism can be devised that:

1- guarantees following the registries (this would require grandparents
somehow being able to check children's registries)

2- makes the fact that a given object has been produced on behalf of a
grandchild explicit

At some point I started thinking about some form of 'lightweight
up/down' for lack of a better name, something that submits requests
upwards but doesn't require operating a CA, but I'm not sure if it's
worth the effort and probably parents won't deploy it anyways.

</personal opinion>

~CArlos

On 8/29/12 1:10 PM, Murphy, Sandra wrote:
> Speaking as wg co-chair:
> 
> Certainly a very lively acceptance call!
> 
> The chairs do not see that there was consensus that the wg should adopt
> this draft.
> 
> But there was ample evidence that the wg was interested in the issue -
> by the wg spending lots of time discussing the issue.
> 
> So that leaves the chairs with an ambivalent message.  The wg is very
> interested in the topic but not in adopting a draft that would record
> any decisions about the topic.
> 
> What would the wg like to do now?  Particularly those who disagreed with
> the content of the draft - if you would dislike the recommendations, are
> you OK with no recommendations instead?
> 
> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of
> Alexey Melnikov [[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:12 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
> 
> Hi,
> On behalf of SIDR WG chairs I would like to initiate 2 weeks acceptance
> call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting starting from today, August 4th.
> Please send your positive or negative feedback to the mailing list or
> directly to chairs.
> 
> Thank you,
> Alexey
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
> 
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to