I would be happy to look at an extension to the proposal to cover "Any
service with local-only significance within the autonomous system".


--
Dean Pemberton

Technical Policy Advisor
InternetNZ
+64 21 920 363 (mob)
[email protected]

To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.


On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Raphael Ho <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think as long as nobody is announcing this out to the general Internet,
> this is an interesting proposal. If the prefix is allowed out on the
> public Internet uncontrolled then I have a problem with potential DNS
> hijacking and other issues (and I agree with Mr Hannigan that¹s where IETF
> needs to come in)
>
> Assuming that the members agree that the prefix would not be internet
> reachable, do we want expand the scope of the proposal to ³Any service
> with local-only significance within the autonomous system², and not limit
> the use? I can see some other interesting uses that would not require
> global routability, but need slightly more flexibility/reachability than
> the usual RFC1918 space.
>
>
>
> On 27/1/14 12:26 pm, "Hannigan, Martin" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>That and isn't the IETF the right venue to carve out a specific from a
>>/8? This is in effect global policy, isn't it?
>>
>>
>>On Jan 25, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> and why won't this leak and make confusion?
>>>
>>> randy
>>> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>>>      *
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sig-policy mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>
>>*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>>    *
>>_______________________________________________
>>sig-policy mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           
> *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to