Hi All,

As you know, it is our current practice that Chair/Co-Chair doesn't
propose a policy by himself/herself in recent APNIC Policy SIG.

However, while it seems that many community members basically agreed with
these problem when I presented them at Singapore
<
https://conference.apnic.net/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/58992/ambiguouts-points-in-pdp-2013027_1361972669.pdf
>,
nobody has picked them up and propose solutions even after 3 years.
In addition, I believe I'm one of persons who felt these problems most
seriously through my service as Co-Chair/Chair.
So, I decided to propose these solutions by myself.

Please note that I have asked Chair's responsibility of this proposal in
Policy SIG discussion to Sumon, Co-Chair,
to avoid a conflict of interests related with this proposal. Also, I will
not run Policy SIG Chair when my term will be end at APNIC 43 in next Feb
or Mar.
so that I don't have a conflict of interests in that meaning as well.

Thus, please accept my replies and comments for this proposal as one of
community views, not Chair's view.

Regards,
Matt



2016-09-05 19:08 GMT+09:00 Adam Gosling <[email protected]>:

> Dear SIG members
>
>
>
> A proposal to modify the APNIC SIG Guidelines relating to the election
>
> of SIG Chairs and Co-Chairs has been submitted for consideration at
>
> APNIC 42 im Colombo, Sri Lanka.
>
>
>
>     https://www.apnic.net/sig-chair-elections/proposed-revision.txt
>
>
>
> If agreed. these changes will affect all APNIC SIGs from APNIC 43 in Ho
>
> Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
>
>
>
> Discussion and call for consensus will take place in the Policy SIG.
>
>
>
>     https://www.apnic.net/mailinglists
>
>
>
> If successful in the Policy SIG, a consensus call will be made at the
>
> APNIC Member Meeting. There will be no final Comment Period.
>
>
>
> To ensure those not travelling to APNIC 42 are able to participate in
>
> the discussion, you are invited to comment on the Policy SIG Mailing
>
> List before the conference.
>
>
>
> More background to this proposal is available at:
>
>
>
>     https://www.apnic.net/community/participate/sigs/chair-elections
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Adam
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Revising eligible voters of Chair election and Chair's term
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Proposer:       Masato Yamanishi
>
>                 [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
> 1. Problem statement
>
> --------------------
>
>
>
> 1. Eligible voters in SIG Chair election
>
> In current SIG guidelines, we have no rule or guideline about eligible
>
> voters in SIG Chair election and we have two issues by the lack of such
>
> rule.
>
>
>
> Firstly, we need to have clear guideline whether remote participants
>
> have voting rights for SIG Chair election since current practice is
>
> different in each election.
>
>
>
> Secondary, it can be used by fraud, like hijacking the position of Chair
>
> agaist the Community by inviting many persons who never attend the
>
> community discussion.
>
>
>
> 2. SIG Chair's term of service
>
> While SIG guidelines says "Elections occur yearly. Chair elections and
>
> Co-Chair elections occur in alternate years.", both elections were held
>
> at same meeting in many cases, in particular when a current Co-Chair
>
> stand for the position of Chair. With this current practice having both
>
> elections at same meeting, we are not seeing any significant issues for
>
> long time.
>
>
>
> In addition, there is no alternative condition for the successor's term
>
> if current Chair/Co-Chair resigned or was removed though such
>
> alternative condition is necessary to maintain staggered term as
>
> requested by SIG guideline. (a.k.a. the successor's term of service is
>
> same as remaining term of resigned or removed Chair)
>
>
>
>
>
> 2. Objective of policy change
>
> -----------------------------
>
>
>
> The objective is preventing confusions related to remote participant as
>
> well as mitigating possible frauds in SIG Chair election by setting
>
> clear rule for eligible voters.
>
>
>
> In addition, we can also expect aligning SIG guideline with current
>
> practice as well as resolving unclearness of the successor's term when
>
> current Chair/Co-Chair resigned or was removed by revising SIG Chair's
>
> term of service.
>
>
>
>
>
> 3. Situation in other regions
>
> -----------------------------
>
>
>
> Please refer following page made by Adam Gosling
>
>
>
> Comparison of RIR SIG/WG Chair Election Processes
>
> https://www.apnic.net/sig-guidelines/chair-elections/other-rirs
>
>
>
>
>
> 4. Proposed policy solution
>
> ---------------------------
>
>
>
> 1. Eligible voters in SIG Chair election
>
> I would like to propose limiting eligible voters of SIG Chair election
>
> to registered participants of APNIC Conference where the election is
>
> held.
>
>
>
> In this context, registered participants include remote participants who
>
> register to Confer, or its successor in future.
>
>
>
> 2. SIG Chair's term of service
>
> I would like to propose aligning Chair' term with Co-Chair's term, which
>
> means that Chair and all Co-Chair will serve for same two years.
>
> To keep this alighment, I would like to propose limiting the successor's
>
> term to remaining term of current Chair/Co-Chair if current
>
> Chair/Co-Chair resigned or was removed.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 5. Advantages / Disadvantages
>
> -----------------------------
>
>
>
> Advantages:
>
> By setting clear rule for eligible voters,
>
>
>
>   - we can avoid confusion whether remote participant cast vote for SIG
>
>     Chair election or not
>
>   - we can mitigate frauds in SIG Chair election
>
>
>
> By revising SIG Chair's term of service
>
>   - we can resolve a conflict between SIG guideline and current practice
>
>   - we can resolve unclearness of the successor's term when current
>
>     Chair/Co-Chair resigned or was removed
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Disadvantages:
>
> APNIC staff may need to spend some additional time to confirm whether
>
> each voter is registered participants.
>
>
>
> There is no disadvantage by revising SIG Chair's term of service.
>
>
>
>
>
> 6. Impact on resource holders
>
> -----------------------------
>
>
>
> No direct impact
>
>
>
>
>
> 7. References
>
> -------------
>
>
>
> Chair Election Procedure Review by Adam Gosling
>
> https://www.apnic.net/community/participate/sigs/chair-elections
>
>
>
> Comparison of RIR SIG/WG Chair Election Processes
>
> https://www.apnic.net/sig-guidelines/chair-elections/other-rirs
>
>
>
> APNIC SIG Guidelines
>
> https://www.apnic.net/community/participate/sigs/sig-guidelines
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>    *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to