------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Secretariat Impact Assessment: prop-153-v001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APNIC notes that the proposed changes are consistent with current
practice and will be reflected in the Policy Development Process
policy.
Questions/Comments:
------------------------------
- The language could be improved so that non-native English speakers
in the community can better understand it. However, if it is acceptable
to the authors and the community, the Secretariat can improve the
language during implementation without affecting the intent of the
proposed solutions.
- Sometimes OPMs at APNIC conferences are held over multiple days,
and a proposal that reaches consensus in the OPM must be put to the
consensus call again at the AGM or AMM. To be consistent and easy to
remember, it would be ideal to open the call for proposals at the end
of the conference's final day.
Implementation:
----------------------
If this proposal reaches consensus, implementation may be completed
within three months.
Regards,
Sunny
On 3/08/2023 5:58 pm, Shaila Sharmin wrote:
Dear SIG members,
A new proposal "prop-153-v001: Proposed changes to PDP" has been sent to
the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting (OPM) at APNIC 56 on
Thursday, 14 September 2023.
https://conference.apnic.net/56/program/program/#/day/8/
We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list
before the OPM.
The comment period on the mailing list before the OPM is an important
part of the Policy Development Process (PDP). We encourage you to
express your views on the proposal:
- Do you support or oppose this proposal?
- Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,
tell the community about your situation.
- Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
- Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
- What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
effective?
Information about this proposal is appended below as well as available at:
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-153
Regards,
Bertrand, Shaila, and Anupam
APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
---------------------------------------------------------------
prop-153-v001: Proposed changes to PDP
----------------------------------------------------------------
Proposer: Bertrand Cherrier ([email protected])
1. Problem statement
--------------------
There has been confusion with the deadline for submission of a proposal.
2. Objective of policy change
-----------------------------
Define the deadline and remove any confusion.
3. Situation in other regions
-----------------------------
N/A
4. Proposed policy solution
---------------------------
4. Proposal process
A policy proposal must go through the following chronological steps in
order to be adopted by APNIC. The time and date are set by the location
of OPM at the upcoming APNIC conference.
Step 1 Discussion before the OPM
A formal proposal must be submitted to the Policy SIG Chairs from
midnight the day following the OPM ends and five(5) weeks before the
next OPM.
The proposal must be in text which clearly expresses the proposal, with
explicit mention of any changes being proposed to existing policies and
the reasons for those changes.
The APNIC Secretariat will recommend a preferred proposal format as
mentioned in Section 5.4 of this document.
Accepted proposals will be sent to the Policy SIG mailing list, by the
Chairs, for discussion at least four(4) weeks before the start of the OPM.
If the five(5) weeks deadline is not met, proposals may still be
submitted and presented for discussion at the OPM; however, no decision
may be made by the OPM regarding the proposal. The proposal will need to
be resubmitted in time for the following OPM, if the author wishes to
pursue the proposal.
If a proposal did not reach consensus, it will have to be amended to
address the issues raised before re-submission, and sent to the Policy
SIG Chairs before the five(5) weeks deadline, otherwise it will be
dropped by the Chairs.
5. Advantages / Disadvantages
-----------------------------
Advantages:
Remove any confusion in the actual text.
Disadvantages:
None.
6. Impact on APNIC
------------------
Minimum (editorial changes).
References
----------
https://www.apnic.net/about-apnic/corporate-documents/documents/policy-development/development-process/
_______________________________________________
SIG-policy -https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
--
_______________________________________________________________________
Srinivas (Sunny) Chendi (he/him)
Senior Advisor - Policy and Community Development
Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) | Tel: +61 7 3858 3100
PO Box 3646 South Brisbane, QLD 4101 Australia | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199
6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD |http://www.apnic.net
_______________________________________________________________________
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.
_______________________________________________
SIG-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
