btw, in response to your other paragraph .. (quoted below) ....

1. u do not sound boastful, but u sound scientific

2. u sure you understand india?

3. i have lived in more than a dozen cities, i have lived in more huts/
villages/ blah yada .. than i remember

4. i bet you, i have read more on india, heard more about india, than i
thought i would be able to yrs back, BUT, i am not sure "other average
indians" have done what they needed to

yet, i dont feel i am qualified to comment for india. u know why?

because 90% of india, may be 95% of india, cannot afford to be a part of the
internet.

:)

"I want to say, if it were ever possible without sounding overly
boastful that I've put in my home work to understand India. I speak 9
Indian languages, I've lived in half a dozen Indian cities, I've
visited 23 Indian states, I've read more original Indian scriptures
and Indian history than the average Indian, hence I feel qualified to
comment on India."

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Srini RamaKrishnan <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:13 PM, divya manian <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> And the dividing line between "self help" rubbish and sensible
> management books is rather thin.  Some of them are definitely not bite size
> platitudes
> >
> > Or non-existent? I think Cheeni wants us all to believe we have a
> > crisis in India which is staggeringly disappointing to anyone who
> > claims to be from India :))) People in India suffer from the same
>
> I want to say, if it were ever possible without sounding overly
> boastful that I've put in my home work to understand India. I speak 9
> Indian languages, I've lived in half a dozen Indian cities, I've
> visited 23 Indian states, I've read more original Indian scriptures
> and Indian history than the average Indian, hence I feel qualified to
> comment on India.
>
> > crises of confidence that plague the Americans or the English - give
> > or take a few cultural biases. Yes, India is not "developed" but that
> > is not really because Indians "lack confidence" but just the right
> > elements for development has not come together yet (things are
>
> You will never find me making a statement that denigrates or
> condescends on the topic. I believe we are all the product of
> circumstances, much like a chemistry experiment where following the
> formula always arrives at the same result.
>
> If India has a crisis of confidence today, it has to do with poverty
> and not with the "Indian gene" if there was any such thing.
>
> My best analogy of India and the US is the comparison between
> vegetable soup and salad. In the US it's still possible to visit China
> town, or the Mexican/Latin quarter and experience the real thing, but
> in India, much like vegetable soup, where you have a flavor and hint
> of the original but not the real thing, we've had time to develop out
> of many inputs.
>
> > happening, so some serendipity might favour India soon). And to put
> > the development of the White World as the work of "confident" white
> > people is to devalue the right potent circumstances that helped bring
> > it about.
>
> I think you read way beyond what I feel. White people never enters my
> world view, why it almost sounds like this youtube video
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glOv4MIyNSE (0:35)
>
> Cheeni
>
>

Reply via email to