## The problem I have is the use of mixed details of other things in an
attempt to prove that a primary element isn't what it is.
That's bait and switch deception.
As in: This O3 is different than that O3....because.... it doesn't have NOX
products and byproducts mixed in it.
Well DUH! That's an entirely different subject. The "O3" is exactly the
same.
The *next* subject is about how to make O3 without the NOX.
If there is no Nitrogen present, it doesn't matter how you do it. It's
still O3 and doesn't have any NOX stuff mixed in.
The *NEXT* subject is about to regulating concentration.
...and the ***next*** , which methods are the most advantageous, for
whatever reasons.
...and so on.
Baiting me to make me mad doesn't work, nor does switching arguments
midstream to make contradictions look like a win.
I'm not fighting. I don't care about winning.
My assertion is that you can access any of the methods pretty cheap and
adjust *operation* to get what you want out of them. Just pick one or some
combination of them and learn how to use it. Some may be easier to set up
properly and some may last longer than others, but O3 is still
O3. *Byproducts* of making O3 wrong, is NOT O3, but the O3 *portion* of
all that is STILL O3.
If you don't want to, that's another subject again.
Being told you can't? I don't like hearing that even if Tesla "sez " so.
He was an infallible genius and you aren't and never can even begin to
understand what this is Allah bout, so buy ...."this"... and defend your
decision like it was a religion simply because you were "taken" for a few
thousand bucks and won't admit it to yourself for fear of feeling like a fool.
[Straight from the con mans Bible]
who thinks that *transmitting energy, free* [made by burning trainload
after trainload of coal in his own private power plant to
go virtually nowhere ]
Thats the second time you've made a reference to this, but I don't find
anything online about it... maybe you'd do better to post evidence, than
just name-call...
## Hey Dude, you brought it up as a comeback "flame" and the facts make it
a backfire.
I implied that sales people use the name of Tesla to divert readers from
using common sense....and they do.
And Dennis Lee makes em all look shabby at it. If you want a REAL "show",
go see him.
If you want the truth told straight, go where Tesla isn't mentioned and the
facts aren't buried under a name with many different irrelevant headings
"designed" to confuse the issues.
Then comes a justification for sales BS based on ...don't you dare
question the "god hood" of Tesla, which just ain't so.
It is, in fact, questionable.
Read his authorized biography as assembled by people who knew him very well.
Blow by blow, quote by quote, who his friends were, why Edison didn't
like him, what his attitudes were, why he did things, who backed him doing
what and when for how much and how long and why they did what they did
while dealing with him.
"Online" is packed with worshippers, salesmen and conspiracy myths. It's
there, but you have to dig a lot.
VERY short overview:
http://www.madehow.com/inventorbios/45/Nikola-Tesla.html
BTW Where did "I" call names?
I tried real hard to avoid getting personal.
Offense and defense games take two to play.
Some people play with themselves, I guess.
Doesn't bother me any.
It's not like I'm not smart enough to know I can be stupid.
Just show me where I went wrong without changing the subject and I'll go
with it.
No big deal. I don't mind being wrong. That's what learning is.
Look, I spent a week taking my car apart and putting it back together in
different ways because it was detonating fit to spit pistons out the tailpipe.
After doing that 50 times, I finally discovered it was a barely tweeked
motor mount and it wasn't detonating, it just sounded that way. Loosening
and re-tightening 2 bolts fixed it.
Everything I did to increase low RPM torque made the problem worse. The
problem got worse because the cam and other modifications were doing what
they were supposed to....make more low end torque and that extra torque was
making the mount weird.
In the meantime:
I emailed the guy that made the cam I put in it, described what it was
doing and he got all defensive. But look guy, I just wanted to know where
to look. If no one else is having this problem, then it's me and MY
car. I didn't say the cam was the problem, just that I encountered a
problem after installing the cam. If you HAVE encountered this, then maybe
you know the solution. If you don't know and I find out..I'll tell you. If
you haven't heard of this, then I know where to NOT look.
The solution is what I want and I don't care what caused the
problem...got that?
His denial [after he got calmed down and started talking straight ] did the
trick and I found it. "No" is a good answer, but only if it's true and
accurate and not about 'something else'.
..and I told him what it was in case it came up again.
Was all that error worth it?
200 miles on 4 gallons of gas, so far..and drives better too. Gained power
where I use it, lost power where I don't. Climbs hills with almost no push
on the pedal that took half throttle before. I can use 5th gear in town
with the engine just barely turning. Won't run 95 MPH anymore.
I took a car apart 50 times over 2 bolts.
Did I feel stupid? Ohh, you BET.
No big deal.
Had it been a paying job, I'd have lost my shorts.
Sometimes lessons are very expensive.
Ode
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.10/976 - Release Date: 8/27/2007 6:20 PM
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
