On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:39:06 -0500 Clayton Family <clay...@skypoint.com> wrote:
> It sounds like you are unaware of Faraday? > No, actually I am not unaware of Faraday, I just fail to see how his work can be used to provide me with detailed chemical analysis of a given substance. As I said, "conductivity of what?" remains an unanswered question. > How can that be? You > sound like an educated woman, and are likely to be able to do the > calculations without trouble- or not? > > If one has pure water and pure silver, then? > It sounds like you are disregarding my concerns. > No unknowns. > > Just facts. > > Calculatable, repeatable, ergo, Provable. > Yes, you are definitely disregarding what I said. > Or were my chemistry professors wrong? And the more than a hundred > years of repeatable experiments to boot. > > It sounds to me like you like to explore obtuse points, which is what > piqued my interest in the discussion. Okay. Well, the desire for detailed analysis without guessing games isn't "obtuse" to me, it's just natural. I'm sorry if my desire for more knowledge offends you, or if you find me "obtuse". BTW, where I come from, an obtuse person usually means someone who doesn't understand or completely ignores what others say to them. Interesting you choose that word for me, isn't it? indi -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
