So is anaerobic a good bug and aerobic a bad bug? (Or visa versa?) I hope I'm not trying your patience too much here but I am just learning about this.
Jo -----Original Message----- From: Marshall Dudley <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, September 25, 1999 6:39 PM Subject: Re: CS>Re: silver-digest Digest V99 #593 >The testing that we had done at UT indicates that CS is effective in killing >both anaerobic as well as aerobic bacteria. Many, many bacteria can switch from >one to the other at will, so in a way this is good, otherwise, lots of the bad >guys would switch to aerobic until the danger was past. Also may aerobic >bacteria cause disease, so it is not really a valid way to separate the good >from the bad. Plus good bacteria can end up in the wrong place and be bad. For >instance, the good intestinal bacteria can end up in a vagina and create real >havoc. > >The reason the CS does not kill bacteria significantly in the intestines is that >it must be very mobile to be effective. It attracts bacteria by it's positive >charge and then zaps them. If the CS particles and bacteria are in a solid >matrix then neither can move until they contact, thus the effectiveness is >greatly reduced. This is actually the best of all possibilities. > >Marshall > >Mercer wrote: > >> Marshall, >> So are you saying that it kills the good stuff too? >> >> Jo >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marshall Dudley <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] >> <[email protected]> >> Date: Saturday, September 25, 1999 9:23 AM >> Subject: Re: CS>Re: silver-digest Digest V99 #593 >> >> > >> > >> >H.SNOW wrote: >> > >> >CS doesn't kill any bacteria, it neutralizes an enzyme that anaerobic >> > >> >> bacteria need to exist in an oxygen atmosphere. All the bacteria that >> >> require this enzyme die out, there are about 650, and the other 2 or 3 >> >> thousand that inhabit the human body are not touched. >> >> >> >> Del Snow >> > >> >That is what we believed, but we paid UT to test what actually happened and >> what I >> >indicated is what the tests show. Theory is nice but when the facts >> contradict the >> >theory, then the experimental results must be accepted and theory >> disguarded. >> > >> >Apparently CS kills bacteria by more methods than the enzyme theory alone. >> I discuss >> >this more at depth in my article at: >> > >> >http://silver-lightning.com/research2.html >> > >> >Marshall >> > >> > >> > >> >-- >> >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. >> > >> >To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: >> >[email protected] -or- [email protected] >> >with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. >> > >> >To post, address your message to: [email protected] >> > >> >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> >> > > > >
