Two methods being tried of which I have heard. I know nothing of quantities.
Psyllium or Clay. I know that clay has a negative charge; that is why pathogens in effluent are removed in about four to six inches of percolation through soil with enough clay. Does that neutralize the CS? The same may be true with Psyllium through the same mechanism which makes agar plate tests of Ag less effective in determining bacterial sensitive than tests done in broth. James Osbourne Holmes [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Walker, Vicky J SUP:EX [SMTP:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 9:56 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: CS>Re: silver-digest Digest V99 #593 You mentioned that the CS does not kill bacteria significantly in the intestines. Can someone recommend something that kills it better in the intestines? thanks -----Original Message----- From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, September 25, 1999 6:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CS>Re: silver-digest Digest V99 #593 The testing that we had done at UT indicates that CS is effective in killing both anaerobic as well as aerobic bacteria. Many, many bacteria can switch from one to the other at will, so in a way this is good, otherwise, lots of the bad guys would switch to aerobic until the danger was past. Also may aerobic bacteria cause disease, so it is not really a valid way to separate the good from the bad. Plus good bacteria can end up in the wrong place and be bad. For instance, the good intestinal bacteria can end up in a vagina and create real havoc. The reason the CS does not kill bacteria significantly in the intestines is that it must be very mobile to be effective. It attracts bacteria by it's positive charge and then zaps them. If the CS particles and bacteria are in a solid matrix then neither can move until they contact, thus the effectiveness is greatly reduced. This is actually the best of all possibilities. Marshall Mercer wrote: > Marshall, > So are you saying that it kills the good stuff too? > > Jo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marshall Dudley <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] > <[email protected]> > Date: Saturday, September 25, 1999 9:23 AM > Subject: Re: CS>Re: silver-digest Digest V99 #593 > > > > > > >H.SNOW wrote: > > > >CS doesn't kill any bacteria, it neutralizes an enzyme that anaerobic > > > >> bacteria need to exist in an oxygen atmosphere. All the bacteria that > >> require this enzyme die out, there are about 650, and the other 2 or 3 > >> thousand that inhabit the human body are not touched. > >> > >> Del Snow > > > >That is what we believed, but we paid UT to test what actually happened and > what I > >indicated is what the tests show. Theory is nice but when the facts > contradict the > >theory, then the experimental results must be accepted and theory > disguarded. > > > >Apparently CS kills bacteria by more methods than the enzyme theory alone. > I discuss > >this more at depth in my article at: > > > >http://silver-lightning.com/research2.html > > > >Marshall > > > > > > > >-- > >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > >To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > >[email protected] -or- [email protected] > >with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > > >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > >
