Penicillin and derivitives, sulfa drugs, tetracycline.

Significantly is probably the wrong word.  Depending on concentration it can
kill significant bacteria anyway, just with much lower effectiveness than it
does in a liquid.  CS kills so well, that even if the effectiveness is 1000:1
less, bacteria will still be killed in the intestines.  The point is that a
normal dosages it will kill virtually everything in the blood, but not enough in
the intestines to cause a problem.

Marshall

Walker, Vicky J SUP:EX wrote:

> You mentioned that the CS does not kill bacteria significantly in the
> intestines.  Can someone recommend something that kills it better in the
> intestines?
> thanks
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 1999 6:36 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: CS>Re: silver-digest Digest V99 #593
>
> The testing that we had done at UT indicates that CS is effective in killing
> both anaerobic as well as aerobic bacteria.  Many, many bacteria can switch
> from
> one to the other at will, so in a way this is good, otherwise, lots of the
> bad
> guys would switch to aerobic until the danger was past.  Also may aerobic
> bacteria cause disease, so it is not really a valid way to separate the good
> from the bad.  Plus good bacteria can end up in the wrong place and be bad.
> For
> instance, the good intestinal bacteria can end up in a vagina and create
> real
> havoc.
>
> The reason the CS does not kill bacteria significantly in the intestines is
> that
> it must be very mobile to be effective.  It attracts bacteria by it's
> positive
> charge and then zaps them.  If the CS particles and bacteria are in a solid
> matrix then neither can move until they contact, thus the effectiveness is
> greatly reduced.  This is actually the best of all possibilities.
>
> Marshall
>
> Mercer wrote:
>
> > Marshall,
> > So are you saying that it kills the good stuff too?
> >
> > Jo
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marshall Dudley <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > <[email protected]>
> > Date: Saturday, September 25, 1999 9:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: CS>Re: silver-digest Digest V99 #593
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >H.SNOW wrote:
> > >
> > >CS doesn't kill any bacteria, it neutralizes an enzyme that anaerobic
> > >
> > >> bacteria need to exist in an oxygen atmosphere. All the bacteria that
> > >> require this enzyme die out, there are about 650, and the other 2 or 3
> > >> thousand that inhabit the human body are not touched.
> > >>
> > >> Del Snow
> > >
> > >That is what we believed, but we paid UT to test what actually happened
> and
> > what I
> > >indicated is what the tests show.  Theory is nice but when the facts
> > contradict the
> > >theory, then the experimental results must be accepted and theory
> > disguarded.
> > >
> > >Apparently CS kills bacteria by more methods than the enzyme theory
> alone.
> > I discuss
> > >this more at depth in my article at:
> > >
> > >http://silver-lightning.com/research2.html
> > >
> > >Marshall
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
> > >
> > >To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
> > >[email protected]  -or-  [email protected]
> > >with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
> > >
> > >To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> > >
> > >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
> > >