Hi, there Ol' Bob .... Ok... I was intending to take a batch in, anyhow,
for testing. However, if I am not getting 20 to 30 ppm, then CSPro wasn't,
either....'cause I cheated and copied the ideas from their webpage...it is
their 'results chart' I look at. I will stay with RO for my "test". Local
natural water is just that, local...I may or may not test it. Since it
appears likely, from what Roger is doing, that electrolyzed water, itself,
carries much of the 'healing properties' I may be as well off with almost
any of the minerals in the 'electrolyzed' water....just an idea, mind you.
After all, the naturally available 'chelates' from veggies, are similar to
'colloidal' particles. Can't see why I shouldn't use my natural source.
Anyone???? Live Long and Prosper Del At 10:08 AM
9/11/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi Del;
>
>My experience with submerged electrodes has been unsatisfactory in that
with in
>several days the CS tends to go yellow when the ppm is above about 9. I
>doubt that you are making 30 ppm. I can test it for you if you like.
>
>I do not understand the arc process used by roger and Marshall as the work in
>air.. The arc process that Dr. Bill Biagoli and myself uses a carbon dioxide
>gas to blanket the arc. This prevents the formation of nitrates with are bad
>news.
>
>The arc process will make about 5 ppm per hour of operation depending on the
>volume of DW used, and the T.E. is almost zero to zero, which means that
it is
>the smallest particle size one can get.
>
>"Ole Bob"
>
>
>--
>The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
>To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
>[email protected] -or- [email protected]
>with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
>
>To post, address your message to: [email protected]
>Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
>
>
