I'll have to learn more about how to use this 'thread'. You make it easy
to read. No argument about accepting your'testimonial' since it is almost
impossible to get independent testing accepted anyhow... but that is
political. Here is my 'testimonial' in exchange. I used very roughly made
CS with a low voltage DC games-transformer, and used another AC
games=transformer with spoons for 'paddles' to treat my leg which was going
black from a hospital infection which had not been cured with doxycycline
drips twice-a-day for 10 days, and oral 'something-or-other' for another
week or so. Black implies gangrene...anyhow I still have my leg.It was
necessary to refine the colloid to smaller particles since the infection
was in the bone-socket initially, and had been chased back to that area, so
I had to pursue the topic and make better gizmos. My doctor raises his
eyebrows in the 'bullshit' position so I quit talking about it. Of course I
accept the curative aspects of colloids (maybe minerals in general) and
electrotherapy. I am only refining already established 'facts' for myself
as far as that goes. The colloid I make with RO is stable. I see no
reason why Distilled is preferable to Reverse Osmosis water as long as both
systems are in proper repair. Currently I am only 'experimenting' with our
well-water. Water is, after all, the 'universal solvent' and absolute
purity is unlikely. I'm glad you test at 1ppm and that it is effective.
That implies that the water, itself, has picked up some healing properties
during your process. "Healing waters" occurring naturally,are not unheard
of, either, even allowing for'hype' some must be bona-fide, eh?At 09:50 AM
9/12/00 EDT, you wrote:
>In a message dated 9/11/00 11:48:15 PM EST, [email protected] writes:
>
><< Subj: Re: CS>Why "spluttering?
> Date: 9/11/00 11:48:15 PM EST
> From: [email protected] (Del Crow)
> Reply-to: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> Ok... but some questions. What testing indicates bacterial and viral
> killing capacity at 1 ppm?
>
>Del: You are going to have to accept an "evidence" based perspective; we are
>not conducting double blind, clinical trials with hundreds of participants.
>Check the archives under my name around late spring early summer. At that
>time I came down with a terrible chest cold and my 1 PPM HVAC CS cleaned out
>the infection within hours AS LONG AS I GOT IT TO THE INFECTION SITE (ears,
>throat and lungs). Swallowing pints of (LVDC) CS appeared to do no good
until
>I sprayed my HVAC CS down my throat (yes, I'm sure the LVDC CS would have
>worked as well). When a head cold flared up a day later, I sprayed it into
my
>nose (lying upside down to get it into my sinus cavity) to relieve the sinus
>infection. This took a little longer to work completely (24-36 hours)
>probably because I had trouble getting it into the sinus cavity -- burned
>like hell.
>
>Doubtless some of the little stinkers would be effectively inactivated or
>killed...which ones have you tried your colloid on?. Is your calculation of
>the ppm unquestionably correct?
>
>Del: I don't know, but why should it matter? Years of experience with CS
made
>by all imaginable electrolytic techniques (some good, some not so good) has
>demonstrated, again and again, that if you can get the CS to the site of the
>infection, it will work its magic within minutes, or even seconds. As far as
>knowing that I was indeed using 1 PPM CS, I have all my HVAC CS batches
>analyzed by AA from a lab that has demonstrated over the years to be quite
>reliable.
>
>I believe I could create a water-submerged arc, but a lot of control would be
> necessary. What difference "Pulsed" DC would make over AC, which is already
> pulsed would be another query I would have.
>
>Del: I must confess that I'm not very knowledgeable in the workings of HV DC
>or AC power
>
> Anyhow, since I have only roughly copied the CSPro web pictures of a couple
>of years ago, got my
> oil-furnace starter about a year ago, and use the CSPro printouts as
> guidelines as to what I am probably producing, I have to respect your
> calculations; mine are only guesses. During the last week or so, I decided
> to try our well-water instead of the RO water. I am not sure, in these few
> gallons whether the other minerals interfere a lot or very little. There
> is about the same 'low-level' Tyndall effect at four hours 10,000vAC as I
> used to get in those accidental 6 and 7 hour batches of RO I occasionally
> forgot about. Like some other people, I think that if you can see the light
> beam too many of the particles will not get much further than the
> bloodstream. Another thing, why would nitrates etc be produced anywhere
> except at the water-surface? I'm not ignoring that air is three-forths
> nitrogen.
>
> Did you test for nitrogen-related products where both AC silver
> electrodes were submerged in water about 2 to3 inches apart and the water
> was uncapped, or loosly capped?
>
>Del: No, but I never liked the CS product made that way. As I recall, it
>wasn't very stabile. To keep things as simple as possible, why not work with
>distilled water so product results will be easier to interpret. Roger
>
>
>--
>The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
>To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
>[email protected] -or- [email protected]
>with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
>
>To post, address your message to: [email protected]
>Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
>
>
