Marshall,

I'm getting the picture, but how slow is the LVDC?
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ode Coyote 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:38 AM
  Subject: Re: CS>New CS generater


  They're all a little or a lot different depending on the setup and specs, but 
both processes can make a similar product. I think it's possible to make a 
higher colloid to ion ratio with HVAC "if" it's set up for that.
  LVDC is cheap, safe and slow. A good constant current unit can equal a good 
HVAC setup, much cheaper, only a lot slower.
  HVAC is very expensive, fast and can be deadly to operate.
  If it's not set up right, HVAC can make silver nitrates or emulsified sludge 
layers very very fast.
  If it is set up right, HVAC can do a very fine job.
  Ken

  At 10:54 AM 9/12/02 -0500, you wrote: 
  >>>>

    Marshall,

    O.K., Now that I understand that much, what makes one or the other better 
or worse in out final product>

    Thanks for taking the time to answer.

    Barbara

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: <mailto:[email protected]>Marshall Dudley 
      To: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] 
      Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 6:43 PM
      Subject: Re: CS>New CS generater

      LVDC is low voltage direct current. Normally the voltage is between 9 and 
30 volts, and the voltage does not change polarity, or if it does, it does so 
at no faster than a couple of times a minute. 

      HVAC is high voltage alternating current. Nominally usually around 10,000 
volts, and 60 hertz frequecy. 

      Marshall 

      Barbara Liles wrote: 

        I haven't been on this long, but need to know the difference between 
LVDC and HVAC. I think that is what I keep reading. I anyone responds, could 
you keep it simple. I don't understand electricity not charging very well! 
Thanks 

          ----- Original Message -----
          From: <mailto:[email protected]>Jack Dayton
          To: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
          Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 5:21 PM
          Subject: Re: CS>New CS generater



            From: "mary lee gladieux" 
<<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> 
            Subject: CS>New CS generater 
            Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:14:58 -0700 

            I'm a newbie to this board with this problem: with my brand new 
colloid master 777, I tried to generate one quart of approx 10 ppm CS but after 
23 hours the process never completed so I shut the processor off. I attempted 
this on the 9th and 10th of this month. Is this huge amount of time normal to 
make CS? Did anyone else experience this on those dates? Thank you for any 
response. 


          ************************************ 
          Hi Mary Lee, 

          I'm not familiar with that generator, but 
          that time is WAAAAY to long. 

          On my LV/DC I do 42ozs of distilled water 
          plus a spike of 2 oz from my last batch just 
          to get things started. It is usually finished 
          in one and one half hours. 
          23 hours ?, something is not right. First 
          reread the instructions carefully, because 
          that time is WRONG! 

          Jack



  <<<<



  -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
  Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
  To post, address your message to: [email protected]
  Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
  List maintainer: Mike Devour