Yep, proved it myself with my scanning photospectrometer. Simply sending thoughts to distilled water would change it's absorption spectrum in the UV range in a consistant manner according to the though forms. Biggest chagnes though were to use reichi type of energy on the water when I was testing that.
I managed to totally mess up the vials the water was in doing that, and had to have a reichi master come in to fix them. Hach said it would be over $100 to replace them. Marshall "Jonathan B. Britten" wrote: > Dr. Tiller of Stanford has a new book out this year about consciousness > and "conditioned" spaces; it purports to prove the reality of thought > influence on space. On researcher has tried to replicate the results > and claims failure. But at a glance, Tiller's laboratory and controls > appear to be first-rate. . . . looking forward to reading the book soon. > > JBB > > On Saturday, Jul 17, 2004, at 00:11 Asia/Tokyo, Marshall Dudley wrote: > > > It is all based on INTENT. Without intent, homeopathic methods cannot > > work. > > After all, anytime you mix anything with water, or even add water to a > > glass > > that is very slightly dirty, it should be creating a homeopathic > > remedy. By the > > time you get any water it should be full of millions of homeopathic > > remedies > > from all the dilutions and encounters it met. > > > > I believe that one does not have to go through the steps to create a > > homeopathic > > remedy, it can be done with intent only. This is done with Holy > > water, created > > with intent only. However the concious mind tends to not accept that > > simply > > directing thoughts at anything can change it, and requires some type > > of physical > > action that it can at least accept as the mechanism. This is > > encountered in > > dowsing quite often. The rods are a physical extension of the intent. > > The > > moving of a vein of water requires hitting a stake driven into the > > ground, > > although physically it does nothing. Without this crutch, the > > concious cannot > > accept that the action can take place, and the subconcious will not > > preform it's > > magic without belief (or faith). > > > > Marshall > > > > Ode Coyote wrote: > > > >> In the case of Homeopathic medicine as tested twice by the Royal > >> Society > >> who at first validated the field, then rejected it, it turned out > >> that the > >> water did not hold a memory. > >> It only worked when the people who 'made' the water held the memory. > >> [The > >> "field" wasn't rejected, only the mechanizm.] > >> In the second round of testing, the people who were diluting the > >> water did > >> not know what they were diluting and it was set up so that no one knew > >> until afterwards, what was what. It didn't work any better than > >> chance. > >> > >> Since it did work better than pure placebo on the first round, it > >> stands to > >> reason that somehow the memory held by the makers of the water was > >> symbolized by the water which was accessed to tune into that > >> memory...possibly similar to the way prayers are accessed by blessed > >> water > >> which also works better than placebo. > >> There is evidence coming to light that memory itself is held as a non > >> local hologram accessed by the brain...tuned into rather than wholly > >> stored > >> there. [Short term memory might be seen as a sort of RAM located in > >> the > >> brain as processing it into meaning is ongoing, where long term memory > >> might be seen as a non local ROM stored as static data with no > >> meanings > >> attached. > >> > >> If that's the case, many many other mysteries..such as instinct.. > >> become > >> clear. > >> > >> If the brain is damaged or otherwise warped in function..access > >> denied, or > >> data in/garbage out.] > >> > >> DNA might be sufficient to explain the formation of the computers > >> circuits > >> but falls short of explaining the patterns of electrical activity IN > >> those > >> circuits. > >> > >> Then there's the aura or a "field" of sorts that surrounds and > >> permeates > >> all things. Does the form construct the aura or does the aura give > >> space/time locality to the componants of the form? > >> > >> How does a cell know 'where to be what' if it's the very first one > >> dividing into many, each with identical DNA? > >> Why doesn't a concrete block, a seething mass of atomic activity, > >> just > >> fall apart? [a 'matter' of 'concrete thought', localized into > >> space/time? > >> Well, something that everyone agrees upon carries a sort of 'apparent' > >> stability whether it's "really" true or not.] > >> > >> It seems to me that the human form, the planet and the universe it's > >> in..all forms in space and time..are a result of consciousness, not > >> the > >> cause of it and that seeming divisions between forms is a definition > >> caused > >> by purposeful perceptive limitations, more like a droplet defining > >> its own > >> size and shape within the ocean and the ocean not caring what the > >> droplet > >> thinks about anything, rather than the ocean saying 'There be a > >> droplet > >> that's not me, somewhere that I am not'. > >> ["Oh!, says God, I've fallen apart! Please o' pieces, make me whole!" > >> Result? religion...and endless arguement about how to fix something > >> that > >> can't happen.] > >> > >> One of the greatest creative powers we have is the ability to fool > >> ourselves in to believing we can't fool ourselves. From there, > >> anything > >> goes, no matter how improbable. [Including a complete and believeable > >> mis- > >> defininition of what a 'we' is, making the we that we thinks we are, > >> apparently self validating.] > >> I believe the only reason we appear to even live in the same > >> universe is > >> because we have agreed to a pattern and a limitation of perception > >> that > >> resides behind the denial that we did that. Perception itself , being > >> a > >> matter of comparisons pidgeonholed into 'this is this and that is not > >> this' > >> depends more on what is not perceived than what is. > >> It's one of the properties of focus where you can't see anything at > >> all if > >> you don't focus and can't see anything else if you do. > >> > >> So, any 'thing' could hold memory in the same way that everything > >> everywhere AND nothing nowhere, always does...as an access symbol to > >> that > >> memory individually distorted in meaning according to the computer > >> program > >> [engram] that processes the memory assigning meaning to it. > >> > >> One mans trash is another mans treasure...same trash 'seen' > >> differently... > >> different meaning and application. > >> > >> Could this be why any medication [including CS] doesn't do the same > >> thing > >> to, or for, every person? > >> Why is it that it's "Side effects may include" rather than "side > >> effects > >> ARE"? > >> > >> It could be that CS works the same for most people because it's simple > >> enough, yet mysterious enough..complete with the symbology that the > >> substance 'silver' holds in the popular conciousness, for most people > >> to > >> agree upon...much like agreeing that getting hit by anything hard, at > >> velocity, sorta hurts. > >> > >> As though, "I" AM that which gets hit vs "Hey! Your car dented my > >> car!" > >> > >> Of course, if the car gets dented so badly it can't be driven, one > >> finds > >> themselves on foot walking. > >> Oops, I can walk! > >> It had [fore] gotton so I'd drive to the mailbox on the door of my > >> garage > >> and read the mail from the occupant of the car next to mine with > >> headlights > >> and photo sensors. > >> [I was 'taught' to drive a certain way from the very day I got this > >> car. > >> Childhood drivers education starts with a wiggle and giggle permit.] > >> > >> Now, Where shall I go? To Detroit [or Korea] for another car, of > >> course! > >> > >> Ode > >>> > >>> As for the science in Silver or anything else, we hummin beans know > >>> so very > >>> little about anything. Just take water for instance. > >>> As our ability to measure things improves we seem to prove more and > >>> more > >>> legends and old wife's tales to be true. > >>> Water we now find not only does have a memory, it goes beyond our > >>> current > >>> state of Western Physics to understand that at a dilution below a > >>> single > >>> molecule level, water can "remember" the substance. > >>> Nothing more than ancient science has been saying for thousands of > >>> years, > >>> culminating in the codified Western idea of Homeopathy. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> Him > >>> Onwards to DMSO, next. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > >>> > >>> Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > >>> > >>> To post, address your message to: [email protected] > >>> Silver List archive: > >>> http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > >>> > >>> Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] > >>> OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html > >>> > >>> List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> > >
