Ode Coyote wrote: > There's a difference between bodies having signals that can be measured with > direct contact and signals being emmitted from them. > No one disputes galvanic skin response or that live cells communicate > electrically. > Obviously, EEG machines work. > > One unrelated subject does not prove a another, though it may sometimes open > an inquiry of relationships which might point to similarities. > > What happens when a lie detector is hooked up to a glass of oil or water? > Then you threaten drinking it or pouring it down the drain? > or place a crystal in it. > > ode
>From the tests I ran, and was privy to, water did not give any response, and >oil is non-conductive so testing it would not have been worth the time. There >were only two things that were found to respond to the death of the shrimp at >the time I last spoke with Cleve. The leaves of plants, and a semiconductive rubber sheet that is made for putting on the shoes of surgeons to keep down static electricity. Back in 1970 Cleve was thinking of making a detection instrument that used the rubber instead of the leaves, but I never heard any followup on that. However the plant does respond if you pour hot water down the drain, or if you stir up a package of yogurt that has fruit in the bottom. Marshall -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
