Ode and Marshall, "Spooky action at a distance"???
RE-WIRING PLANTS: Frequencies of intent and conscious awareness? When working with plants to create 'evidence', one has to establish with the plants what rows will take the 'balance' - via botany criteria and intent. Otherwise all the plants in that section, of that species, will take the correction and you'll have no 'original condition - stressed, insect ridden, sickly or diseased' plants remaining. With BodyTalk one sets up with the plant which row will be 'enhanced - balanced' for these purposes. Generally, rows of plants want a commitment that the 'other folks' in the untapped row will get their tapping after the experiment and gathering of evidence. *grin* "Spooky action at a distance" ? http://www.planttalksystem.com/aboutus.htm Animals are different. Maximum effectiveness is communicating with the leader of the herd, group, flock, whatever, and then the info will pass through that 'community' of animals. Dealing with the 'wimp of the litter' may not move the information upwards. Just like with plants, each species and genes is different, and must be respected for their uniqueness. People - a long story...... but it can change interactions in families when some of the anger is released in one - especially the 'head' of the family. Sickliness can be unbalanced energy systems - changing thoughts/beliefs occur when the systems (organ, endocrine, or other body parts individually or linked together) find better balance communicating to, from or within each other. "Spooky action at a distance"... Almost 100 years ago Einstien said there was no distance or time. That's so with these frequency transmissions. It works - even 1/2 round the world! A new paradigm?? Christine > From: Ode Coyote <[email protected]> > > I do believe that there is an absolute FTL communication medium...probably > having to do with nonlocality phenomenon fairy recently demonstrated by > instantantious electron [or was that photon?] rotation changes and called > "Spooky action at a distance" by Einstien. > > I wouldn't think that plants have very many conflicting opinions. > I don't think people and plants 'emit' signals. I think we walk around in > nonlocal 'existant' fields of them. Tune in/tune out, wiggle the dial for > degrees of distortion. > > It could be that the brain is nothing more than a filter and brain waves > are interferance patterns that make the filter work by cancellation. > > Ode > >> From the tests I ran, and was privy to, water did not give any response, > and oil is non-conductive so testing it would not have been worth the time. > There were only two things that were found to respond to the death of the > shrimp at the time I last spoke with Cleve. The leaves of plants, >> and a semiconductive rubber sheet that is made for putting on the shoes of > surgeons to keep down static electricity. Back in 1970 Cleve was thinking > of making a detection instrument that used the rubber instead of the > leaves, but I never heard any followup on that. >> >> However the plant does respond if you pour hot water down the drain, or if > you stir up a package of yogurt that has fruit in the bottom. >> >> Marshall -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
