Mike Monett wrote: > "Jonathan B. Britten" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes, that was the part that lent credibility to their claims. I > > think NASA is not easily duped. Time will tell. > > >JBB > > You are kidding. NASA is now funding projects to study antigravity > formed above a rotating disk, and ion lifters which have been > analyzed and proven to be unscalable. Complete waste of money. They > should use it to make more robotic satellites, and more visible and > UV telescopes to replace Hubble. >
Why is it a complete waste of money? The antigravity effect above a rotating disk is a well established phenomonen despite no one having a theory as to why it occurs yet. That was confirmed at Oak Ridge National Lab several years ago to my personally by one of their scientists. You won't see many papers on it though because researchers tend to not publish papers on experiments who's effect they cannot explain, plus there is a big clamp on publishing this type of thing anyway for "National Security" reasons.. The common UFO apprears to be a combination of a rotating disk and high voltage, which definitely is capabile of antigravity. When you know there is a result, why not explore all the possible means you can to get there? Marshall -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
