sip-implementors  

Messages by Date

• 2006/11/13 [Sip-implementors] From Tag and To Tag - regarding Raj
• 2006/11/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors] Query on max-forwards counts ben . bonnaerens
• 2006/11/13 [Sip-implementors] FW: Query on max-forwards counts Song, Youngsun
• 2006/11/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors] Query on max-forwards counts sreeram.kanumuri
• 2006/11/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors] Query on max-forwards counts Kasturi Narayanan
• 2006/11/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors] Query on max-forwards counts Bogdan Pintea
• 2006/11/13 [Sip-implementors] SIP vs. H.323 Abdelrhman Ahmed
• 2006/11/13 [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors] Query on max-forwards counts Tomasz.Kazmierczak
• 2006/11/13 Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Bulk Call Test Steve DiStefano \(sdistef\)
• 2006/11/13 [Sip-implementors] Opaque part of AbsoluteURI and the general URI Veda R
• 2006/11/11 Re: [Sip-implementors] Only one session in forking case zhang jw
• 2006/11/11 Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Bulk Call Test Williamson, Robert
• 2006/11/11 [Sip-implementors] Only one session in forking case giamur
• 2006/11/11 [Sip-implementors] Re-transmission in forking case giamur
• 2006/11/10 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on max-forwards counts Brett Tate
• 2006/11/10 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on max-forwards counts Somesh S Shanbhag
• 2006/11/10 [Sip-implementors] SIP TCP/TLS use of ephemeral ports Russ Daigle
• 2006/11/10 Re: [Sip-implementors] Call ID and To and from tags Dale . Worley
• 2006/11/10 [Sip-implementors] Query on max-forwards counts Song, Youngsun
• 2006/11/10 [Sip-implementors] Call ID and To and from tags giamur
• 2006/11/10 [Sip-implementors] Call-ID Giancarlo Murino
• 2006/11/10 [Sip-implementors] Regarding Bulk Call Test Nitin Arora
• 2006/11/10 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Proxy Server Attila Sipos
• 2006/11/10 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Proxy Server Balaji . Murlitharan
• 2006/11/10 [Sip-implementors] SIP Proxy Server atul sharma
• 2006/11/10 [Sip-implementors] Bulk Call Test nitin arora
• 2006/11/10 Re: [Sip-implementors] Source port in Via/Contact headers for TCP/TLS Fredrik Thulin
• 2006/11/10 Re: [Sip-implementors] Source port in Via/Contact headers for TCP/TLS Russ Daigle
• 2006/11/10 Re: [Sip-implementors] Source port in Via/Contact headers for TCP/TLS Fredrik Thulin
• 2006/11/09 Re: [Sip-implementors] uri parameters syntax Dale . Worley
• 2006/11/09 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC3327 Path header - how many support it? Klaus Darilion
• 2006/11/09 [Sip-implementors] uri parameters syntax BAYLE Marc
• 2006/11/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] Clarification on offer/answer Umesh
• 2006/11/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] Source port in Via/Contact headers for TCP/TLS Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2006/11/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] Putting Record route in the responses Steve DiStefano \(sdistef\)
• 2006/11/08 [Sip-implementors] Source port in Via/Contact headers for TCP/TLS Russ Daigle
• 2006/11/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] Clarification on offer/answer Brett Tate
• 2006/11/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] Clarification on offer/answer Paul Kyzivat
• 2006/11/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] Clarification on offer/answer prince . philip
• 2006/11/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] Fwd: Query Gaurav Kheterpal
• 2006/11/08 [Sip-implementors] Fwd: Query ManMohan Singh Bisht
• 2006/11/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] Clarification on offer/answer Jeroen van Bemmel
• 2006/11/08 Re: [Sip-implementors] Clarification on offer/answer Darshan Bildikar
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Clarification on offer/answer Vivek Gupta
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Clarification on offer/answer prince . philip
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Clarification on offer/answer Darshan Bildikar
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Clarification on offer/answer Jeroen van Bemmel
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK in proxy server for 200 OK Jeroen van Bemmel
• 2006/11/07 [Sip-implementors] Clarification on offer/answer Umesh
• 2006/11/07 [Sip-implementors] ACK in proxy server for 200 OK Arif
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Adding Bindings rfc3261 sec10.2.1 Dale . Worley
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Adding Bindings rfc3261 sec10.2.1 Prasad, Santosh
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Adding Bindings rfc3261 sec10.2.1 Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Adding Bindings rfc3261 sec10.2.1 Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Adding Bindings rfc3261 sec10.2.1 Sarkar, Uttam
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Adding Bindings rfc3261 sec10.2.1 Sarkar, Uttam
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Adding Bindings rfc3261 sec10.2.1 Prasad, Santosh
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Adding Bindings rfc3261 sec10.2.1 Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2006/11/07 [Sip-implementors] Adding Bindings rfc3261 sec10.2.1 Prasad, Santosh
• 2006/11/07 Re: [Sip-implementors] Different user name in requri and To-uri Vivek Gupta
• 2006/11/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding cseq Frank Shearar
• 2006/11/06 [Sip-implementors] Query regarding cseq Prema
• 2006/11/06 [Sip-implementors] Stateless SIP proxy Baniel Uri-CUB001
• 2006/11/06 Re: [Sip-implementors] Help needed for the branch ID creation Fredrik Thulin
• 2006/11/06 [Sip-implementors] Regarding AS support for Private Header Extensions nandakishore
• 2006/11/06 [Sip-implementors] Help needed for the branch ID creation Abhit Kalsotra
• 2006/11/05 Re: [Sip-implementors] ENUM/NAPTR granularity Fredrik Thulin
• 2006/11/05 [Sip-implementors] ENUM/NAPTR granularity Baniel Uri-CUB001
• 2006/11/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] Host in the R-URI Paul Kyzivat
• 2006/11/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] Host in the R-URI Gary Cote
• 2006/11/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] Different user name in requri and To-uri Gary Cote
• 2006/11/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] Host in the R-URI Manpreet Singh
• 2006/11/04 Re: [Sip-implementors] Different user name in requri and To-uri Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2006/11/04 [Sip-implementors] Different user name in requri and To-uri Manish Jain
• 2006/11/03 [Sip-implementors] Moved Temporarily or Moved Permanently? Giancarlo Murino
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] Host in the R-URI Paul Kyzivat
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] Host in the R-URI Manpreet Singh
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] Host in the R-URI Paul Kyzivat
• 2006/11/03 [Sip-implementors] Host in the R-URI Manpreet Singh
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC3327 Path header - how many support it? Diego B
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] whats wrong with this 200 OK? - trace included Siddhardha Garige
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] whats wrong with this 200 OK? - trace included Kasturi Narayanan
• 2006/11/03 [Sip-implementors] whats wrong with this 200 OK? - trace included Siddhardha Garige
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC3327 Path header - how many support it? Umesh Sharma
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] Rules about Call ID, From tag and To tag Gary Cote
• 2006/11/03 [Sip-implementors] Information about Service-info-token? nadine . staelens
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] Rif: Re: Rules about Call ID, From tag and To tag Bogdan Pintea
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] Rules about Call ID, From tag and To tag Bogdan Pintea
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] Rules about Call ID, From tag and To tag B, Nataraju
• 2006/11/03 [Sip-implementors] Any known implementations/products supporting RFC 3578 ? Muthu Arul
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] Rules about Call ID, From tag and To tag Balaji . Murlitharan
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling a of re-INVITE before initial ACKis received Stephen Paterson
• 2006/11/03 [Sip-implementors] Rules about Call ID, From tag and To tag Giancarlo Murino
• 2006/11/03 Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sip] seek help about "multicast in SIP" samuel
• 2006/11/02 Re: [Sip-implementors] DNS query Dale . Worley
• 2006/11/02 [Sip-implementors] DNS query nishant mandilwar
• 2006/11/02 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC3327 Path header - how many support it? Gary Cote
• 2006/11/02 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC3327 Path header - how many support it? B, Nataraju
• 2006/11/02 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query sending 200 for INVITE Gary Cote
• 2006/11/02 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC3327 Path header - how many support it? Attila Sipos
• 2006/11/02 [Sip-implementors] Sip softphone SDK smartnet telecom
• 2006/11/02 [Sip-implementors] regarding daylight saving support in SIP P Jayaram
• 2006/11/01 [Sip-implementors] Help on sipp usage Young Tao
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Allow header field Dale . Worley
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling a of re-INVITE before initial ACK is received Dale . Worley
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling a of re-INVITE before initial ACK isreceived Brett Tate
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling a of re-INVITE before initial ACK is received Bala Neelakantan
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] "Anonymous" display-name in SIP URI Paul Kyzivat
• 2006/11/01 [Sip-implementors] "Anonymous" display-name in SIP URI Smith, Nigel \(Com US\)
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Paul Kyzivat
• 2006/11/01 [Sip-implementors] Handling a of re-INVITE before initial ACK is received Stephen Paterson
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Register Request Balaji . Murlitharan
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Agrawal, Vishal
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Sarkar, Uttam
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Sarkar, Uttam
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Sarkar, Uttam
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Sarkar, Uttam
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Register Request Dale . Worley
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Register Request Paul Kyzivat
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Register Request Divya Sachdeva
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Register Request Balaji . Murlitharan
• 2006/11/01 [Sip-implementors] RFC3327 Path header - how many support it? Attila Sipos
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Register Request Vivek Gupta
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Register Request Divya Sachdeva
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] REDIRECT SERVER Balaji . Murlitharan
• 2006/11/01 [Sip-implementors] REDIRECT SERVER jafer sharif mohammed
• 2006/11/01 Re: [Sip-implementors] Register Request Balaji . Murlitharan
• 2006/10/31 [Sip-implementors] Register Request Divya Sachdeva
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Allow header field Gaurav Kheterpal
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] No charge indication in 183 session progress Gaurav Kheterpal
• 2006/10/31 [Sip-implementors] Allow header field [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2006/10/31 [Sip-implementors] Query sending 200 for INVITE Tang Xi
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Asymmetric RTP payload types Paul Kyzivat
• 2006/10/31 [Sip-implementors] Asymmetric RTP payload types Dale . Worley
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Dale . Worley
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Paul Kyzivat
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Sarkar, Uttam
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Dale . Worley
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Experience with connected UDP sockets Dale . Worley
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Sarkar, Uttam
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE B, Nataraju
• 2006/10/31 [Sip-implementors] Query 100rel in re-INVITE Tang Xi
• 2006/10/31 Re: [Sip-implementors] Experience with connected UDP sockets Alfred E. Heggestad
• 2006/10/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] Error in IANA assignments re:Accept-Resource-Priority [RFC4412] Gaurav Kheterpal
• 2006/10/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] Tools: test delay ACK for 200 OK INVITE Gaurav Kheterpal
• 2006/10/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] Experience with connected UDP sockets Dale . Worley
• 2006/10/30 [Sip-implementors] Tools: test delay ACK for 200 OK INVITE Young Tao
• 2006/10/30 [Sip-implementors] Experience with connected UDP sockets Alfred E. Heggestad
• 2006/10/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP over tcp Manpreet Singh
• 2006/10/30 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP over tcp Gary Cote
• 2006/10/29 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP over tcp Attila Sipos
• 2006/10/29 [Sip-implementors] SIP over tcp Manpreet Singh
• 2006/10/27 [Sip-implementors] My speakers live in a fish tank Andrew Chalk
• 2006/10/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] Putting Record route in the responses hemanth kumar
• 2006/10/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] 3-way handshake Brett Tate
• 2006/10/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] 3-way handshake Manish Jain
• 2006/10/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query for retransmite PRACK and 200 Mahipati Deshpande
• 2006/10/25 [Sip-implementors] Query for retransmite PRACK and 200 Tang Xi
• 2006/10/25 Re: [Sip-implementors] Inquiry about 408 Request Timeout Processing zhang jw
• 2006/10/25 [Sip-implementors] Inquiry about 408 Request Timeout Processing Sumin Seo
• 2006/10/25 [Sip-implementors] Error in IANA assignments re: Accept-Resource-Priority [RFC4412] Rhys D Ulerich
• 2006/10/25 [Sip-implementors] SIP 180 vs 183 using information received in ACM BCI Charles Yeager
• 2006/10/25 [Sip-implementors] SIPit 19 Summary (redux) Robert Sparks
• 2006/10/25 [Sip-implementors] SIPit 19 summary Robert Sparks
• 2006/10/25 Re: [Sip-implementors] 3-way handshake Markus Hofmann
• 2006/10/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] [SIPForum-discussion] Putting Record route in the responses Steve Parrish
• 2006/10/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query: Call Hold Implementation in SIP/SDP Paul Kyzivat
• 2006/10/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query: Call Hold Implementation in SIP/SDP Sarju Garg
• 2006/10/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] a 1xx for non-Invite request SHOULD NOT be generated? Dale . Worley
• 2006/10/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query for Offer/Answer Mahipati Deshpande
• 2006/10/22 [Sip-implementors] Query for Offer/Answer Tang Xi
• 2006/10/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] a 1xx for non-Invite request SHOULD NOT begenerated? Jeroen van Bemmel
• 2006/10/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] a 1xx for non-Invite request SHOULD NOT be generated? Gary Cote
• 2006/10/22 [Sip-implementors] a 1xx for non-Invite request SHOULD NOT be generated? 蓝思中
• 2006/10/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query: Call Hold Implementation in SIP/SDP Dale . Worley
• 2006/10/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query: Call Hold Implementation in SIP/SDP Paul Kyzivat
• 2006/10/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query: Call Hold Implementation in SIP/SDP Agrawal, Vishal
• 2006/10/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] Calculation of subscription duration - updated Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2006/10/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] user name missing in AOR Mahipati Deshpande
• 2006/10/20 [Sip-implementors] Calculation of subscription duration - updated Marco Ambu
• 2006/10/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] Bheavior when any of the mandatory header is missing Prithvi
• 2006/10/18 [Sip-implementors] No charge indication in 183 session progress Ganesh Pitchiah S
• 2006/10/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Query:How can UA ignore a precondition offer? Gary Cote
• 2006/10/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] user name missing in AOR Paul Kyzivat
• 2006/10/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Bheavior when any of the mandatory header is missing David Benoit
• 2006/10/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] user name missing in AOR Gary Cote
• 2006/10/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Bheavior when any of the mandatory header ismissing Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2006/10/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Bheavior when any of the mandatory header ismissing Tarun Kapoor
• 2006/10/18 [Sip-implementors] user name missing in AOR Vivek Gupta
• 2006/10/18 [Sip-implementors] Bheavior when any of the mandatory header is missing Vivek Gupta
• 2006/10/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] branch tag in Via header David Stuart
• 2006/10/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] Re-transmitting of ACK for RE-INVITE aftera newre-invite Brett Tate
• 2006/10/17 [Sip-implementors] AstriVideoCon: Asterisk, SIP and Video meeting in Paris Olle E Johansson
• 2006/10/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] Re-transmitting of ACK for RE-INVITE after a newre-invite Brett Tate
• 2006/10/17 Re: [Sip-implementors] Re-transmitting of ACK for RE-INVITE aftera newre-invite Paul Kyzivat
• 2006/10/17 [Sip-implementors] Regarding Media and Signalling using same path. Satya Kiran Tadala

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]